In a significant victory for the cleaning industry and public health advocates, California Assembly Bill 916, known as the “Safer Soap Act,” failed to advance following strong opposition from a broad coalition of trade associations and industry leaders. ISSA, the Worldwide Cleaning Industry Association, along with twelve other prominent trade organizations, played a crucial role in highlighting the potential risks and unintended consequences of the proposed legislation.

The bill, which sought to ban certain antimicrobial soaps and body washes, faced substantial pushback from industry, which emphasized its potential impact on public health, food safety, and vulnerable populations. The coalition’s successful advocacy efforts demonstrated the power of unified industry action in protecting essential cleaning and hygiene products.

“This outcome represents a significant win for our members and, more importantly, for public health and safety,” said a spokesperson for the cleaning industry coalition. “The continued availability of antimicrobial products is crucial for protecting vulnerable populations and maintaining high standards of hygiene in various settings, from healthcare facilities to food service establishments.”

The coalition, which included organizations such as the American Cleaning Institute, Consumer Brands Association, and California Chamber of Commerce, presented compelling arguments against the legislation. Key concerns included:

• The potential impact on immunocompromised individuals and elderly populations who rely on antimicrobial products for protection against harmful bacteria
• Risks to food safety, as antimicrobial soaps play a vital role in preventing foodborne illnesses, which are 44% caused by bacteria, according to CDC data
• The importance of maintaining effective hygiene tools for home healthcare practitioners, schools, daycare centers, and nursing homes
• The need to allow the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) to complete its ongoing scientific review of the targeted chemicals before making legislative decisions

The coalition’s success in preventing the advancement of AB 916 also highlighted the importance of following established scientific processes. Rather than rushing through legislation that could have had far-reaching consequences, the industry advocated for a more measured approach that would allow for comprehensive data analysis and understanding of potential impacts.

Furthermore, the coalition effectively argued that the proposed ban would have conflicted with federal regulations, specifically the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, which recognizes these ingredients as lawfully marketed drugs. This legal conflict could have created significant challenges for businesses operating in California.

John Nothdurft, Director of Government Affairs for ISSA, said, “This outcome preserves our members’ ability to continue providing essential products and services that protect public health. It also demonstrates the effectiveness of industry collaboration in addressing legislative challenges that could impact business operations and public safety.”

The coalition’s success in opposing AB 916 serves as a reminder of the cleaning industry’s vital role in maintaining public health and safety. It also underscores the importance of evidence-based policymaking that considers the practical implications for businesses, consumers, and vulnerable populations.

Moving forward, the industry remains committed to working with legislators and regulators to ensure that any future proposals regarding cleaning and hygiene products are based on sound science and consider the full range of public health implications.